Page 20 of 38

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:05 pm
by Ran
I remember that Elmer Fudd cartoon.

According to the 80s tv show opening, Buck Rogers left earth in 1987. We were much more optimistic about our space program in 1979.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:25 am
by Ran
Die Hard 5? I forgot they made a 4th.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:18 pm
by Ran
Triple post. Woo hoo!


I heard that they announced remakes of Carrie and Evil Dead at Comic Con. Bruce Campbell is the executive producer for Evil Dead.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:42 pm
by Diabolical
They were both announced a while ago. They were probably debuting first looks at ComicCon.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:40 pm
by RoIIo Tomassi
Arnold Schwarzenegger is coming back to play Conan in a Reboot? WhattyMcWhatWhat?!?!

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:01 pm
by Ran
Speaking of unnecessary sequels....A Christmas Story 2 comes out next next week. They are skipping the theaters and going straight to home video.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:36 pm
by Diabolical
Don't you dare call A Christmas Story 2 a pathetic remake of shit!
This is far, far worse.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:20 am
by anarky
Someone (I think DB, actually) posted the trailer to FB.

Normally, I'd send five bucks to Daniel Stern, because he clearly needs the money. But, in this case, I think he needs to be tried for crimes against humanity instead.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:13 pm
by anarky
RoIIo Tomassi wrote:Arnold Schwarzenegger is coming back to play Conan in a Reboot? WhattyMcWhatWhat?!?!
Is it a reboot, or a rollback? I doubt Hollywood would like the word, but I'm using "rollback" to mean "a reboot from a reboot, back to the previous continuity." Rise of the Planet of the Apes was a rollback. Playing Conan as an old man in a rollback might make sense. Not saying it won't suck, though.

Hollywood and the media really overuse "reboot." I saw tons of articles describing Pirates 4 as a "reboot," since it didn't have Bloom and Knightley, never mind it picks right up from the end of Pirates 3.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:59 pm
by Tom Foolery
I was wondering if maybe he'll be playing the old Conan and somebody else will be playing the younger version in a flashback/forward style narrative.

In the original stories, Conan lived to a ripe old age, so I don't have a problem with Ahnuld playing an older King Conan.

I didn't see the Jason Momoa reboot from a few years ago. Did it suck?

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:24 pm
by Ran
So it really isn't a remake, but doesn't that new Tom Cruise movie look like one of the crappy action flicks from the 90s? Complete with cheesy tough guy dialog.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:36 pm
by RoIIo Tomassi
It looks like NCIS: The Movie. Or worse yet, NCIS Los Angeles: The Movie.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:44 pm
by anarky
They're remaking Superman again.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:11 pm
by Sleazer
Lord of the Rings part 4.

Re: What's up with the pathetic remakes of shit

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:58 pm
by RoIIo Tomassi
Sleazer wrote:Lord of the Rings part 4.
Technically, it's LotR:Episode One.


...I just had a strong sense of dejavu about this post.